A translation tool for face-to-face conversation.
A browser-based MVP for people who do not share a language. I designed the turn-taking workflow and tested it in cafés in Gyumri. The observations are qualitative, with further device, language and reliability testing still needed.
- Problem
- Multilingual face-to-face talk
- Languages
- Persian · Armenian · English · German · Russian
- Evidence
- Qualitative café field observations
- Status
- Working MVP
Conversation has a workflow.
When two people don't share a language, the problem is bigger than translating a sentence. They need a clear way to take turns, know when to speak, and keep going while they wait for the result. PyxMint treats the whole exchange as the product: people, speaking actions, noisy surroundings and pacing.
Make each speaking turn explicit.
The product is built around push-to-talk rather than always-on listening. A participant speaks a turn in the browser, the translation completes, and the next participant continues. An optional transcript and a usage allowance based on active speaking time are part of the documented scope.
Product decisions, and the questions they leave.
- Browser-based: one shared surface for face-to-face exchange; device conditions still need a structured test matrix.
- Push-to-talk: an explicit speaking action; turn length remains a key usability question.
- Optional transcript: its value for continuity needs more testing.
- Five languages: not evidence of equal quality in every direction.
What the field test exposed.
Testing in a Gyumri café brought the MVP into a noisy, real setting. Noise was a practical condition; some Armenian → Persian attempts showed sentence-start issues; synthetic Armenian input did better than some live, noisy attempts; and longer turns made latency more noticeable. These are qualitative observations, not benchmarks.
Known limits and next tests.
Evidence is qualitative; no quantified accuracy or latency results are claimed; production-scale reliability isn't established. The proposed next step is a repeatable test matrix (language direction, quiet vs noisy, live vs synthetic, short vs long turns, browser and device) before stronger claims are made.
Where does your workflow lose clarity?
Describe the current process, the people involved and where work gets stuck. We can work out what a practical first system should do.